Get ethical open-source research, digital footprint review, source checking, and a concise investigation report for vendor screening, ecommerce checks, brand-risk review, partnership due diligence, and online identity clarity.
Online investigations involve ethical research across public digital sources to identify relevant facts, verify signals, and organize evidence into a clear decision-ready report. This service is built for founders, ecommerce teams, agencies, procurement teams, finance leaders, marketing teams, and professional-service companies that need structured clarity before working with a vendor, partner, seller, brand, domain, profile, or online claim. Each investigation focuses on useful findings, source transparency, and careful separation of confirmed information from assumptions.
Each delivery is designed to help you act on the research, not just collect links. The report explains what was found, where it was found, how reliable it appears, and what may need further confirmation.
View PackagesPricing is structured for small business and freelance marketplace buying patterns, with simple starting rates for clear scopes. Complex, multi-region, or sensitive business cases may require a custom quote.
A concise snapshot investigation for one simple question or subject.
Best for: Simple checks, early screening, or a quick online context review.
A broader investigation for most business, vendor, seller, or partner checks.
Best for: Teams that need a balanced report with clear evidence and context.
A deeper priority investigation for serious decisions and multi-source review.
Best for: Companies, agencies, and teams with higher-impact decisions.
| Package | Best fit | Starting price | Delivery | Revisions | Main output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic Package | Simple or small needs | $50 | 2 days | 1 | Concise PDF summary |
| Standard Package | Most business checks | $75 | 3 days | 2 | PDF, DOCX, and evidence log |
| Premium Package | Priority or deeper review | $100 | 5 days | 3 | Executive summary, evidence table, and CSV file |
Online findings can be noisy, duplicated, or misleading. This service focuses on practical verification, organized reporting, and clear communication so your team can understand what the public evidence does and does not show.
Contact MeFindings are grouped by relevance, source, and confidence so decision-makers can review them quickly.
No generic template report. The scope, sources, and final structure are matched to your research question.
Packages use clear delivery windows, with scope review before work begins to reduce delays.
Questions are handled in plain language so you know what is needed, what is possible, and what is out of scope.
Included revisions help refine report clarity, add reasonable source notes, or correct scope-related issues.
Deliverables are formatted for internal review, stakeholder briefings, procurement checks, or agency workflows.
These example projects show how the service can be adapted to different buyer situations. Each scope is adjusted to the available information, decision timeline, and required reporting depth.
Public-source review of a potential supplier, including company references, web presence, visible inconsistencies, and supporting source notes.
Result: clearer onboarding discussion with fewer unanswered questions.Investigation of a website footprint, visible ownership signals, content reuse, online reputation mentions, and linked digital assets.
Result: practical risk context before outreach or ad spend.Review of a seller’s public marketplace activity, related profiles, consistency markers, reviews, and visible dispute indicators.
Result: faster screening for an ecommerce purchasing team.Online review of public mentions, suspicious pages, copied wording, visual similarity, and source references for internal brand protection review.
Result: documented examples ready for escalation review.Review of public professional profiles, social signals, business associations, and visible timeline consistency for a partnership decision.
Result: concise profile context with uncertainty clearly marked.Collection and organization of relevant public posts, pages, timestamps, source links, and summary notes for an internal response team.
Result: easier stakeholder briefing with source-backed context.The workflow keeps the project focused, reduces confusion, and gives you room to review the findings before accepting the final delivery.
Select the depth that matches your deadline, subject count, and decision risk.
Share identifiers, links, target geography, known context, and the question you need answered.
Relevant public sources are reviewed, findings are checked, and weak matches are separated from stronger evidence.
Read the draft or delivery notes and request scope-related clarifications where needed.
Download the final report and use it for internal review, stakeholder briefing, or business decision-making.
Clients use this service when they need practical online research delivered in a format that is easy to review and share internally.
The report was clear, sourced, and easy to use in our vendor review meeting. Communication stayed practical from the first message, and the revision added exactly the extra context we needed.
I needed a concise digital footprint review before a partnership decision. The findings were organized by source, risk level, and confidence, which made the final decision much easier.
Fast delivery without rushed writing. The summary separated confirmed facts from likely connections, and the evidence log made it simple for our team to review everything internally.
The investigation helped us understand a marketplace seller before onboarding. The communication was professional, the scope was realistic, and the final report was structured well.
The revision process was smooth. I asked for additional source notes, and they were added in a clean table with no confusion or extra back-and-forth.
Professional, careful, and useful. The delivery gave us enough evidence to brief leadership without turning the report into a long technical document.
Review the most common questions about scope, files, timing, revisions, ownership, custom offers, and support before placing an order.
It includes ethical open-source research, digital footprint review, source checking, evidence notes, and a clear report. The exact scope depends on the package, the subject, the available public information, and the business question you need answered.
You should provide the investigation objective, known names or identifiers, relevant websites or profiles, geography, timeline, and any sources you already checked. Clear inputs help reduce false matches and keep the report focused.
Delivery usually takes 2 to 5 days depending on the selected package and the complexity of the research. Wider source review, multiple entities, or urgent business questions may require a custom timeline.
Yes, urgent delivery can be requested when the scope is suitable. Availability depends on the number of subjects, source complexity, required depth, and whether the request can be completed responsibly within the shorter timeline.
Revisions cover clarifications, formatting improvements, reasonable follow-up source checks, and corrections within the agreed scope. They do not cover a completely new subject or a different investigation objective unless a custom add-on is agreed.
Most deliveries include a PDF report. Standard and Premium packages may also include DOCX, CSV, or spreadsheet-style evidence logs when the research requires structured source tracking.
Yes, you can use the final report for your internal business review, decision-making, or professional records. Ownership does not transfer rights over third-party public data, platform content, or external source materials.
Basic is for a simple snapshot, Standard is for most business checks with a wider evidence log, and Premium is for deeper review across multiple entities or higher-priority decisions. The main differences are depth, turnaround, file formats, and revisions.
Yes, custom packages are available for unusual scopes, multiple subjects, agency workflows, ecommerce cases, corporate due diligence, or recurring research. Share the objective and required deadline so the quote can match the work involved.
Start with a revision request that explains what is missing or unclear. If the issue is within the agreed scope, the delivery can be corrected or clarified. Refund handling depends on the order platform and the completed work.
Communication stays focused on requirements, scope confirmation, progress questions, and final delivery notes. You may be asked for clarification if there are similar names, incomplete identifiers, or conflicting source signals.
Yes, reasonable after-delivery support is available for file access, report clarification, and questions about how findings are organized. New investigation work, new subjects, or additional source checks may require a separate order.
