Game development turns a design concept into an interactive software build: player input, movement, rules, game states, UI, progression, save behaviour, asset integration and platform-specific performance all have to work together. Rudrriv manages the delivery as a professional service, so the customer does not have to search for separate programmers, technical artists, testers or coordinators for a bounded project.
The service is designed for practical scopes such as validating a core game loop, building a playable MVP or vertical slice, adding a defined set of gameplay systems, improving an existing project, or preparing a stable build for broader playtesting. A package is not presented as a substitute for a full AAA or long-running live-service production; larger work is scoped separately.
Share the game concept, target player and platform, core mechanic, expected scenes or levels, controls, reference games, available art/audio, preferred engine if there is one, and any integrations you already know you need. For an existing project, include the source project or repository, engine version, package dependencies, current build and known issues. Rudrriv uses those inputs to confirm what fits the selected package before development begins.
Rudrriv reviews the mechanic, platform, engine, assets and success criteria, then confirms the bounded deliverables and assigns suitable professionals.
The agreed gameplay systems, scenes, UI and supporting logic are implemented with review checkpoints before major scope decisions are locked.
The build is tested against the agreed flow, states, controls and target environment; tracked feedback is applied within the package revision allowance.
You receive the agreed test build, organized source project and handoff notes so the project can move into wider playtesting or the next production phase.
Choose by the amount of gameplay, scene coverage, polish and handoff depth you need. All three packages are intentionally bounded; projects outside these limits are assessed before a custom quote is issued.
| Included | ₹12,499 Essential Core Loop Prototype For validating one central mechanic in a playable test build. | ₹29,999 Professional Recommended Playable Game Build For a broader prototype or MVP-style build with multiple connected systems. | ₹59,999 Advanced Production Vertical Slice For a more polished slice that demonstrates the intended gameplay and presentation direction. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playable scenes / levels | 1 | Up to 3 | Up to 5 |
| Gameplay systems | 1 core mechanic | Up to 3 | Up to 5 |
| Player controls & game states | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| UI / HUD | Basic | Polished | Polished + menus |
| Save / settings system | — | Basic save state | Save + settings |
| Asset integration | Supplied / placeholder | Supplied / agreed assets | Broader integration |
| Selected integration | — | — | 1 agreed integration |
| Target-platform builds | 1 | 1 | Up to 2 |
| QA / performance review | Core-flow testing | Gameplay + performance pass | Deeper QA + performance pass |
| Source project handoff | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Revision rounds | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Standard delivery | 7 days | 14 days | 21 days |
| Package price | ₹12,499 | ₹29,999 | ₹59,999 |
Examples of the kinds of outcomes this managed service can support. Final scope is always tied to the selected package or a custom assessment.
Build the smallest playable version of the concept so stakeholders can test whether the main interaction and game loop are worth developing further.
Connect multiple gameplay systems into a more complete build with UI, save behaviour and target-platform checks for controlled playtesting.
Take over a defined part of an existing project to add gameplay, stabilize problem areas or complete a milestone without replacing the whole codebase.
Our Game Development brief was fairly specific, and the team picked up the context quickly without forcing us through unnecessary process. The core of the engagement was a playable game build, and the team avoided distracting us with features that were outside the goal. The work was careful around core mechanics, game loop, performance, UI systems, save states, and testing, and that reduced the number of issues found late in the project. The handoff process was clear, with enough explanation for our team to understand what had changed and why. What we received in the end was a game build that felt cohesive, responsive, and ready for broader playtesting. We would use the same team again for related work because the delivery was dependable without being over-engineered.
Our previous attempt at Game Development had left several loose ends, so we wanted a more disciplined second pass. They delivered a playable game build and kept the work aligned with the original business need. They paid close attention to core mechanics, game loop, performance, UI systems, save states, and testing, which were exactly the areas we were concerned about. Their communication was practical and specific, which made technical decisions much easier for our non-technical stakeholders. By launch, we had a game build that felt cohesive, responsive, and ready for broader playtesting. The project ended in a much better state than it began, both technically and from an ownership perspective.
We brought in the team for Game Development because we wanted a production-minded implementation, not just a proof of concept. Their job was to produce a playable game build, and they handled both the visible work and the less obvious technical details behind it. We were particularly happy with the attention to core mechanics, game loop, performance, UI systems, save states, and testing. We never had to chase for status; blockers and decisions were raised early enough for us to respond. We finished the project with a game build that felt cohesive, responsive, and ready for broader playtesting. We would use the same team again for related work because the delivery was dependable without being over-engineered.
Tell us what you want players to do, where the game needs to run and what already exists. Rudrriv will review the brief and identify the right package or custom scope.
