We chose this Due Diligence service because we wanted a specialist approach rather than a generic finance deliverable. From the first review, the team kept the work anchored to a financial due diligence review of earnings quality, working capital, debt-like items, and key financial risks and checked revenue quality, normalization adjustments, customer concentration, working capital, liabilities, and data consistency carefully. Communication stayed clear, and each review round ended with specific actions rather than vague follow-ups. The project left us with a more complete view of the transaction risks before we moved forward.
Managed Financial Due Diligence for Clearer Deal Decisions
- Financial due diligence for acquisitions, investments, funding and other material business decisions.
- Analysis can cover earnings quality, revenue consistency, working capital, net debt, debt-like items, customer concentration and cash conversion.
- Rudrriv manages professional assignment, information requests, execution, quality review, communication and final delivery.
- Three scopes range from a focused red-flag review to a deeper transaction analysis with supporting schedules.
- The service is decision support, not a statutory audit, legal opinion, formal valuation or investment recommendation unless separately scoped.
What Clients Appreciate
See client reviewsAbout This Financial Due Diligence Service
Transaction-focused analysis of the numbers behind the deal
Financial due diligence helps a buyer, investor, lender or other decision-maker understand whether a target company’s reported performance is sustainable and whether financial issues could affect price, structure, liquidity or post-transaction expectations. Rudrriv’s managed service coordinates the professionals, data requests, analytical work, review cycles and final reporting from brief to delivery.
The work is designed around the decision you need to make. Rather than treating the exercise as a generic checklist, the scope focuses on the financial questions that can change a transaction: the quality and durability of earnings, revenue concentration, normal working capital, net debt and debt-like obligations, cash conversion, accounting consistency and the evidence supporting management’s explanations.
- Quality of Earnings (QoE) analysis and a reported-to-normalised EBITDA bridge.
- Revenue quality, trend, mix, cut-off and customer-concentration analysis.
- Historical working-capital analysis, seasonality review and normalisation considerations.
- Net debt, debt-like, cash-like and visible contingent-obligation schedules.
- Reconciliation of management reporting to available statutory or filed financial information.
- Cash-conversion, margin and cost-structure observations where the supplied data supports them.
- Forecast and sensitivity review in broader scopes when management projections are provided.
- Prioritised red flags, supporting schedules, management questions and decision-focused reporting.
Share the transaction type, target entity, ownership or investment context, review period, desired decision date and the questions you most need answered. Financial inputs commonly include historical statements, monthly management accounts, trial balances or ledger exports, debt and bank schedules, receivables/payables ageing, customer-level revenue, related-party information, tax or GST reconciliations where relevant, forecasts and material supporting documents. The exact information request is confirmed after scope assessment.
Rudrriv clarifies the transaction, material questions, review period, data availability and package boundaries.
The assigned professionals test financial trends, reconcile available data and investigate material inconsistencies or adjustments.
Material findings are organised, evidence gaps are identified and targeted questions are raised for clarification.
Rudrriv reviews the output for consistency and delivers the agreed report, schedules and follow-up clarification support.
Financial due diligence is not a substitute for a statutory audit, legal due diligence, formal tax opinion, regulated valuation, investment advice or a guarantee that every undisclosed issue will be identified. Conclusions depend on the scope, data made available, management responses and the quality of underlying records. Additional entities, specialist workstreams, site visits or unusually fragmented data may require a custom quote.
Compare Due Diligence Packages
Choose a scope based on the depth of analysis, historical period, transaction complexity and level of supporting schedules you need.
| Included | ₹11,999 Essential Financial Red-Flag Review For focused early-stage or smaller transaction decisions. | ₹24,999 Professional Recommended Core Financial Due Diligence For common single-entity acquisition, investment or funding reviews. | ₹49,999 Advanced Extended Transaction Review For deeper historical testing and more complex decision support. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Review period | Up to 12 months + YTD | 2 financial years + YTD | 3 financial years + YTD |
| Quality of Earnings | Focused adjustments | Normalised EBITDA bridge | Extended QoE analysis |
| Working capital | Red-flag review | Monthly analysis | Seasonality + peg considerations |
| Net debt & debt-like items | Major items | Detailed schedule | Expanded schedule |
| Revenue / customer concentration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cash-conversion analysis | — | Targeted | Expanded |
| Forecast / sensitivity review | — | Limited | ✓ |
| Management clarification | 1 round | 2 rounds | 2 rounds + closing Q&A |
| Standard delivery | 7–10 business days | 10–15 business days | 15–20 business days |
| Final files | PDF red-flag memo | PDF + XLSX schedules | Executive summary + PDF + XLSX |
| Package price | ₹11,999 | ₹24,999 | ₹49,999 |
Due Diligence Analysis Workstreams
Explore the financial questions the review can cover. Actual depth depends on the package, transaction context and data made available.
Normalised earnings bridge
Separate recurring operating performance from one-off, non-operating and transaction-specific items.
Frequently Asked Questions
Client Reviews
The final result from our Due Diligence project was strong and closely aligned with the brief. The team translated our requirements into a financial due diligence review of earnings quality, working capital, debt-like items, and key financial risks while keeping revenue quality, normalization adjustments, customer concentration, working capital, liabilities, and data consistency visible throughout. The team explained the reasoning behind key choices, which made approvals easier for both finance and non-finance stakeholders. That work resulted in a more complete view of the transaction risks before we moved forward.
We hired the team for Due Diligence and needed a result that could stand up to internal review. The deliverable was structured around a financial due diligence review of earnings quality, working capital, debt-like items, and key financial risks; the treatment of revenue quality, normalization adjustments, customer concentration, working capital, liabilities, and data consistency was especially useful. Milestones were easy to review, files were organized, and changes were tracked carefully as the work developed. By the end, we had a more complete view of the transaction risks before we moved forward.
Request a Financial Due Diligence Quote
Tell us what decision you are preparing for, what entity or target is being reviewed, what data is available and when you need the findings. Rudrriv will assess the scope and recommend the most suitable package or a custom engagement.