Account Architecture
Which accounts exist, which entity owns them, what purpose each serves and where duplication or unnecessary complexity may exist.
The review connects accounts, payment routes, fees, user access and liquidity needs so the final recommendations are based on operational fit rather than isolated product features.
Business banking becomes harder to manage as accounts, payment methods, users, entities and provider relationships accumulate. A setup that worked when the business was smaller can become expensive, fragmented or difficult to control. Rudrriv’s Banking service reviews the current arrangement as an operating system: what each account is for, how money moves, who can initiate or approve activity, which services are being paid for, how liquidity is accessed and where the setup no longer matches the way the business actually operates.
The service is designed for businesses that want a documented, independent review before they rationalise accounts, change payment processes, revisit banking services or prepare for a broader treasury improvement project. Rudrriv manages the delivery team, consolidates the work and provides a quality-controlled handoff rather than leaving the customer to coordinate individual specialists.
Provide the business and entity structure, a list of relevant accounts and providers, the purpose of each account, key payment and collection workflows, known pain points, fee schedules or statements where appropriate, user and approval roles, treasury objectives and any fixed decision deadline. Sensitive credentials are not required for the initial enquiry and should never be submitted through the public form.
Confirm entities, accounts, providers, workflows, objectives, available records and the decisions the review must support.
Document account purposes, payment routes, fees, treasury dependencies, user roles and operational handoffs.
Review duplication, service usage, payment controls, liquidity needs, access responsibilities and areas requiring clarification.
Check the logic, assumptions, supporting evidence and consistency of the findings before they are presented.
Deliver the agreed files, prioritised recommendations, unresolved questions and implementation steps for customer approval.
Choose the package by the number of entities and accounts involved, the depth of payment and treasury review required, and whether you need a focused findings summary or a broader implementation-ready roadmap.
| Included | ₹4,999 Essential Banking Setup Review For one business that needs a focused assessment of its core banking setup. |
₹14,999 Professional Recommended Banking Operations Review For businesses that need payment, fee, treasury and controls review across a broader environment. |
₹29,999 Advanced Banking & Treasury Optimisation For multi-entity setups that need deeper rationalisation and an implementation roadmap. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business entities | 1 | Up to 2 | Up to 3 |
| Bank / payment accounts | Up to 3 | Up to 6 | Up to 10 |
| Account structure review | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fee & service review | Core | Detailed | Detailed + comparison |
| Payment workflow mapping | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Permissions & approval controls | Checklist | Control matrix | Detailed control matrix |
| Treasury / liquidity review | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Account rationalisation | — | Observations | ✓ |
| Implementation roadmap | — | Prioritised actions | Detailed roadmap |
| Revision rounds | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Standard delivery | 5 working days | 7 working days | 10 working days |
| Final files | PDF + XLSX | PDF + XLSX | |
| Package price | ₹4,999 | ₹14,999 | ₹29,999 |
The exact depth changes by package, but these are the core operating areas that shape whether a banking setup is efficient, controlled and practical for the business using it.
Which accounts exist, which entity owns them, what purpose each serves and where duplication or unnecessary complexity may exist.
How payments are initiated, reviewed, approved, released and reconciled across teams, portals and provider relationships.
User roles, maker-checker responsibilities, administrative ownership, approval thresholds and avoidable concentration of access.
Visible charges, service usage, underused facilities, duplicated services and questions that should be raised with providers.
Cash visibility, working balances, concentration, timing of inflows and outflows, and practical access to operating liquidity.
Dependencies, internal owners, provider conversations, sequencing and the practical steps required to move from findings to change.
We hired the team for Banking and needed a result that could stand up to internal review. They built the work around a banking review covering account structure, payment workflows, treasury needs, fees, and service options, with consistent attention to account setup, transaction flows, payment controls, liquidity access, fee structure, user permissions, and operational fit. They were responsive to comments and also flagged areas where our initial assumptions needed a second look. We came away with a simpler banking setup that better matched our day-to-day requirements.
Our Banking brief had several moving parts, but the process stayed focused. The assignment covered a banking review covering account structure, payment workflows, treasury needs, fees, and service options. We especially valued the focus on account setup, transaction flows, payment controls, liquidity access, fee structure, user permissions, and operational fit. The handoff was practical, with enough explanation for our team to maintain the work after the engagement ended. Ultimately, the engagement delivered a simpler banking setup that better matched our day-to-day requirements.
We engaged the team specifically for Banking and were pleased with the balance of technical depth and practicality. From the first review, the team kept the work anchored to a banking review covering account structure, payment workflows, treasury needs, fees, and service options and checked account setup, transaction flows, payment controls, liquidity access, fee structure, user permissions, and operational fit carefully. Progress was steady, and the team kept the analysis understandable without oversimplifying the important details. The project left us with a simpler banking setup that better matched our day-to-day requirements.
Tell us how your current banking setup works, what is causing friction and what you want the review to help you decide. We will assess the scope and respond with the most suitable package or a custom option.