Find the technical barriers that can prevent search engines from discovering, rendering and indexing the right pages. Our Technical SEO audit turns crawl data, indexation signals, architecture issues and performance risks into a prioritized action plan your team can use.
Published plans are audit-first scopes. Remediation, migrations, very large websites and advanced setups can be quoted separately after review.
Each plan is a one-time diagnostic engagement with a defined URL scope. The entry plan uses the current lowest credible market-supported price for a meaningful small-site Technical SEO audit.
For small websites that need a focused technical diagnosis before investing in deeper SEO work.
For growing sites that need deeper crawl, indexation, architecture and structured-data review.
For larger or more complex websites that need a detailed developer-ready technical handoff.
Get in touch with our expert. Tell us what you need, and we'll help identify the most suitable service, scope and pricing for your requirement.
The workflow is designed to separate symptoms from root causes, verify affected areas and hand your team a practical order of operations.
Confirm website size, business context, target market, known issues and required audit depth.
Review how URLs are discovered, linked, redirected and exposed to search-engine crawlers.
Check directives, canonicals, sitemaps and other signals that affect which pages should be indexed.
Review mobile, performance, structured data and technical page-delivery signals within scope.
Group issues by severity, affected templates or URLs, dependencies and likely implementation order.
Provide the audit report, evidence, fix list and agreed review so the next actions are clear.
Technical SEO is not a single score. A useful audit connects crawl behavior, indexation signals, site architecture and technical page delivery so your team can see which problems are isolated and which ones affect entire templates or sections.
Exact depth depends on the selected plan and the site architecture.
The audit focuses on evidence that changes crawl, render or index behavior. It does not pad the report with unrelated marketing observations.
Review whether important pages can be discovered efficiently and whether crawl traps, loops or inaccessible paths need attention.
Check how robots directives, canonical tags, sitemaps and response codes work together to signal preferred indexable URLs.
Identify chains, loops, broken targets, duplicate URL variants and status-code patterns that create unnecessary friction.
Check broken internal paths, inconsistent targets and architecture signals that affect discovery and page relationships.
Validate technical markup and flag implementation errors or inconsistencies that can prevent intended machine-readable signals.
Review performance and Core Web Vitals-related technical issues in context so remediation can focus on root causes.
Check technical delivery signals that can make mobile pages difficult to render, use or evaluate consistently.
Identify repeated technical patterns across templates, parameters or rendered content where they affect search accessibility.
The value of a technical audit is knowing what to fix first. Findings are organized so developers, marketers and decision-makers can distinguish urgent blockers from lower-risk cleanup.
Issues that can prevent important pages from being crawled, rendered or indexed as intended.
Technical patterns affecting many URLs, templates or important search-entry pages.
Issues that create unnecessary crawl, redirect, link or performance friction without fully blocking visibility.
Items that need confirmation, stakeholder context or follow-up after implementation.
Deliverables are structured so leadership can understand the priorities while the technical team can see affected areas, issue logic and recommended next steps.
A concise view of technical health, major blockers and the order in which problems should be addressed.
Examples, affected URL groups or exports that make it easier to reproduce and understand the issue.
A fix-ready list designed to support developer planning, QA and post-change validation.
The service is especially useful when the site has changed, grown or become difficult to diagnose through content and keyword work alone.
Check whether crawl, indexation, status-code or template changes may be contributing to lost search visibility.
Review redirect mapping, canonicals, sitemap changes and indexability before or after a move.
Identify crawl, faceted-navigation, duplicate URL and internal-linking patterns as the site expands.
Investigate whether rendered content and technical signals are available consistently where relevant to search.
Understand why important pages are excluded or why low-value variants are appearing in the index.
Connect page-performance symptoms to technical causes and a practical remediation sequence.
Technical SEO decisions are stronger when the site context is clear and each recommendation can be traced back to an observable technical condition.
Keep the first brief practical. More access is requested only when the audit scope genuinely requires it.
The goal is to reduce false alarms and make the final recommendations easier to validate during implementation.
Practical answers about audit scope, pricing, access, deliverables, implementation and delivery.
The audit reviews crawlability, indexation signals, XML sitemaps, robots directives, canonical tags, redirects, broken links, response codes, internal linking, structured data, mobile and performance signals, and other technical factors relevant to the selected plan. You receive prioritized findings and recommended next actions.
The listed plans are primarily audit and recommendation engagements. They identify issues, affected areas and implementation priorities. If you want Rudrriv to implement fixes, share that requirement in the enquiry form so the remediation scope can be quoted separately.
Plans start at $25 USD for a meaningful small-site technical health audit. The medium crawl audit is $50 USD and the Technical SEO Audit Plus plan is $99 USD. Larger websites, migrations, multi-domain setups or implementation work may require a custom quote.
The standard delivery window is 5–7 working days after the required website information and any agreed access are available. Very large or complex sites may need a custom timeline.
At minimum, provide the website URL, approximate site size, target market and the main technical concern. If available and appropriate, you can also share relevant crawl, analytics or search-console evidence through the agreed project workflow after scope confirmation.
Yes. Technical SEO is especially relevant to ecommerce and catalogue sites where faceted navigation, crawl paths, duplicate URLs, canonicals, pagination and indexation patterns can become complex. Sites beyond the published plan limits can be handled under a custom scope.
Yes. A Technical SEO review can be scoped around migration readiness or post-launch validation, including redirects, canonicals, indexability, sitemap changes, status codes and other migration-sensitive signals. A larger migration may require a custom engagement.
Not always. Many audit checks can start from the public website and information you provide. If deeper validation requires access to a platform, search-console data, logs or a staging environment, the exact access requirement will be confirmed before work begins.
Depending on the plan, you receive an audit summary, prioritized issue list, affected URL examples or exports, implementation notes and a fix-ready action checklist. Higher plans include more depth and a more detailed developer-oriented handoff.
No. Technical SEO work can remove technical barriers and improve the conditions search engines use to crawl, render and index a site, but rankings and traffic also depend on content, authority, competition, search demand, implementation quality and other factors.
Yes. If your site uses complex rendering, international targeting, multiple domains or subdomains, faceted navigation or other advanced architecture, describe it in the enquiry. Rudrriv can confirm whether a published plan is suitable or whether a custom scope is more appropriate.
Choose the closest plan or use the Technical SEO enquiry form below. Share your website, approximate site size, main concerns and desired timeline. Rudrriv will review the requirement and confirm the appropriate audit scope before work starts.
Required fields help us evaluate the site and route your request without sending you away from this page.
