Turn unsupported or unclear balance-sheet balances into documented reconciliations that tie the ledger to available evidence, explain reconciling items and give your reviewer a cleaner path through month-end close.
Start with a focused account, group a few month-end accounts together, or request a custom scope for broader and recurring reconciliation work.
For a focused mismatch or one balance-sheet account that needs a documented tie-out.
A targeted reconciliation of one selected balance-sheet account for one reporting period.
For small finance teams closing a month with several accounts that need review together.
A compact month-end package covering up to three selected balance-sheet accounts.
For broader account populations, recurring close support, multi-entity work or complex open items.
A scoped engagement built around account count, entities, periods, evidence quality and review requirements.
Pricing is an entry-point guide for the visible scope. Final scope can change with account count, periods, entities, evidence quality, aged items and the amount of investigation required.
Get in touch with our expert. Tell us what you need, and we'll help identify the most suitable service, scope and pricing for your requirement.
A six-step workflow moves from source collection and account mapping to variance investigation, documentation and reviewer-ready hand-off.
Receive the trial balance, ledger detail, period, supporting schedules and relevant third-party evidence.
Define what each selected ledger balance should tie to and identify the evidence required for review.
Compare ledger balances to supporting records and calculate any unexplained difference or open item.
Trace timing items, misclassifications, omissions, stale balances or other exceptions within the agreed scope.
Record reconciling items, evidence references, explanations and proposed adjustments for your review.
Package the reconciliation status so an internal reviewer can follow the balance, support, exceptions and next actions.
The reconciliation approach changes with the account. A cash balance ties to external statements differently from a prepaid account, accrual, loan or intercompany balance, so the supporting evidence is defined account by account.
Ledger balances compared with bank, processor or clearing evidence, including timing items where relevant.
Control-account balances tied to sub-ledgers, ageing reports and supported reconciling items.
Balances reviewed against schedules, period coverage, roll-forwards and expected expense recognition.
General-ledger balances compared with fixed-asset schedules and movement support within the agreed period.
Account balances tied to statements, schedules, agreements or counterpart records where available.
Selected liability accounts reviewed against payroll reports, schedules, filings or other relevant support.
A useful reconciliation does more than make two numbers match. It should show what supports the ledger, what remains unresolved and what a reviewer needs to decide next.
Evidence is assessed based on what the account should reasonably tie to for the period.
Differences are documented so they can be resolved, approved or carried forward with a clear owner and rationale.
Complete, period-specific source records reduce back-and-forth and make it easier to separate genuine reconciling items from missing support.
The selected period's closing balances plus transaction-level activity for the accounts in scope.
Bank statements, processor records, lender statements or other third-party evidence relevant to the account.
AR/AP ageing, fixed-asset register, prepaid schedule, accrual schedule, payroll report or equivalent detail.
Previous-period reconciliations and carry-forward items help explain opening balances and aged exceptions.
Any existing notes about timing, disputes, missing documents, reclasses or adjustments already under review.
Reporting period, due date, account owner, reviewer expectations and any internal template or sign-off convention.
Outputs are designed to show the account balance, supporting evidence, reconciling items and next action clearly enough for an internal reviewer to follow the logic.
This comparison describes the direct working-state change the reconciliation service can create; it does not represent guaranteed commercial outcomes.
Reviewers must search across statements, schedules and notes to understand the account.
The reconciliation shows what supports the ledger and where the evidence is referenced.
Timing items, reclasses and missing support may sit in emails or informal notes.
Each exception is documented with the amount, explanation and next action where available.
Old items remain in the account without a current explanation or clear owner.
The service separates items that need evidence, correction, approval or further investigation.
The account may appear correct without showing how the conclusion was reached.
The reconciliation is organized around a repeatable review path rather than scattered evidence.
See which balances are supported, which contain reconciling items and which need follow-up.
Give reviewers a structured record of evidence, differences and account conclusions.
Surface unexplained or aged items before they continue rolling into future close periods.
Use a repeatable reconciliation structure across selected accounts and reporting periods.
Make ownership, evidence references and outstanding actions easier for finance teams to follow.
A finance team needs selected balance-sheet accounts tied to support before internal review and close sign-off.
Several periods have accumulated open items or old balances that need a structured cleanup review.
A new reviewer needs a clearer understanding of what supports key accounts and which items remain unresolved.
A broader close process needs repeatable reconciliation templates, status tracking and a defined review cadence.
These are illustrative service scenarios—not customer testimonials or claimed Rudrriv project results.
The work would compare the ledger to the prepaid roll-forward, identify the difference and document the items requiring correction or additional support.
The engagement would reconcile each account to its relevant support, separate timing items from unsupported differences and produce a compact reviewer summary.
The scope would be defined around periods, account population and available evidence, with aged items categorized for support, correction, approval or continued investigation.
Illustrative examples show service structure only. They do not represent named customers, guaranteed outcomes or historical Rudrriv performance claims.
Best for a specific account mismatch, one reporting period or a focused cleanup requirement.
Best for a small set of key accounts that need a consistent close package for reviewer hand-off.
Best when account volume, entities, cadence or control requirements need a separately scoped operating model.
Answers to common buying, scope, delivery and hand-off questions.
Balance sheet reconciliation is the process of comparing each selected general-ledger balance with reliable supporting evidence, explaining differences, identifying reconciling items and documenting whether the account is supported for the reporting period.
The scope can include cash and clearing accounts, receivables and payables, prepaid expenses, accruals, payroll or tax-related liabilities, fixed assets, loans, equity, intercompany balances and other supported balance-sheet accounts. Final coverage depends on the records and evidence available.
Typical inputs include the trial balance, general-ledger detail, reporting period, bank statements or other third-party evidence, sub-ledgers or ageing reports, fixed-asset or loan schedules, prior reconciliations and any known open-item explanations.
Rudrriv plans start at $15 USD for a focused single-account reconciliation. A month-end pack starts at $50 USD for up to three selected accounts, while broader, recurring or multi-entity requirements are quoted after scope review.
The standard delivery window is 5–7 working days for the defined entry and month-end packages. Larger account populations, multiple entities, missing support or complex aged items may require a separately agreed timeline.
The service can identify and document proposed adjustments or correction entries for your review. Direct posting into your accounting system is performed only when it is explicitly included in the agreed scope and appropriate access and authorization are provided.
Depending on the selected plan, you can receive a reconciliation worksheet, account status summary, reconciling-item or exception log, supporting-evidence index, proposed adjustment notes and a reviewer-ready close summary.
Yes. Catch-up or cleanup reconciliation can be scoped for older periods and aged balances. The effort depends on how many periods are involved, the quality of the ledger history and whether adequate supporting evidence is available.
No. Balance sheet reconciliation is an accounting support service focused on tying ledger balances to supporting records and documenting differences. It does not by itself provide an audit opinion, assurance report, tax opinion or statutory certification.
Yes. The scope can be adapted around selected accounts, entities, close calendars, reviewer requirements, recurring cadence, exception tracking and hand-off needs. Use the enquiry form to describe your account population and close process.
Tell us which period and accounts you need reconciled. We will review the account population, available support, open-item complexity and desired close timeline before confirming the right scope.
