Monthly Close Support
- Sales and settlement posting / review
- Payment and marketplace fee classification
- Refund, dispute and adjustment treatment
- Bank and payout reconciliation
- Month-end close checks and agreed reporting
Online retail finance does not stop at recording a sales total. Store orders, marketplace settlements, processor fees, refunds, chargebacks, bank deposits, currencies and inventory inputs can move on different timelines. Rudrriv provides scoped accounting support that connects those flows into reviewable records and a practical month-end close.
Global delivery. Final scope, close cadence and pricing are confirmed after reviewing your channels, accounting system and data readiness.
Pricing is shown as Custom Quote because ecommerce accounting effort changes materially with transaction volume, channel count, processor complexity, currencies, inventory treatment, cleanup history and reporting depth. Each option below describes what you are buying before a quote is confirmed.
Share the channels you sell through, your accounting system and the main reconciliation problem. We can use that context to confirm whether the work should start as catch-up, recurring close support or a broader multi-channel scope.
In ecommerce, a single bank payout can represent many orders and several deductions. Useful records require enough detail to explain how gross order activity became the net settlement that reached the bank.
Orders may be placed and captured before a processor or marketplace groups them into a later payout. Close work therefore needs date-aware settlement matching rather than treating each deposit as direct revenue.
Fees, refunds, disputes, reserves and adjustments can reduce or shift the payout. Those movements need to be separated so the ledger explains the economics of the channel rather than only the cash received.
For product businesses, revenue is only one side of the picture. Where inventory accounting is in scope, cost data and agreed inventory inputs need to arrive in time for COGS and margin reporting to be meaningful.
This flow is the core reason ecommerce bookkeeping is more than bank coding. Each stage can create timing differences, deductions or data dependencies that should be reconciled before the close is treated as complete.
Important: tax treatment, inventory valuation policy, statutory reporting and other judgement-heavy accounting decisions remain subject to the responsible qualified finance or tax professional when they fall outside the agreed operational accounting-support scope.
The work performed and the outputs delivered are separated below so you can see the difference between accounting activity and the evidence or records you receive at handoff or month-end.
Good reconciliation depends on complete source data. The initial enquiry should only describe your setup; detailed reports and system access can be shared later through the agreed project workflow after scope confirmation.
Chart of accounts, current balances, prior close status and access appropriate to the work being performed.
Order, sales, refund, tax and settlement exports or connected data needed for the agreed channels.
Bank statements or feeds plus marketplace / processor payout reports used to trace net deposits.
Approved inventory and cost information when product-cost accounting is part of the monthly close scope.
Known disputes, reserves, unusual refunds, prior adjustments or historical issues that explain differences.
Required management views, close deadlines and stakeholders who need to review the resulting records.
Prior reports or opening balances when the engagement begins mid-year or after a period of incomplete books.
A person who can resolve classification questions, approve mappings and coordinate with the responsible accountant or tax adviser.
Exact platforms are confirmed from your setup. The examples below show common categories of data that can affect ecommerce reconciliation; they do not imply official partnerships or automatic support for every configuration.
A single channel can still involve multiple reports. For example, payout reports may contain transactions, fees, refunds, disputes and adjustments that must be interpreted separately from sales reports and from the final bank deposit.
The process adapts to your existing accounting environment. A catch-up project may spend more time on historical exceptions; a recurring engagement focuses on a repeatable monthly data and close routine.
Review channels, processors, accounting system, bank accounts, currencies, inventory dependencies and reporting needs.
Identify how order activity, settlement reports, deductions and net bank payouts should connect to the ledger.
Process agreed records, reconcile payouts and bank activity, and trace differences using available source data.
Surface missing data, unusual adjustments, uncertain classifications and judgement items rather than silently forcing a match.
Review reconciliations, inventory / COGS inputs when included, and the agreed month-end reporting outputs.
Provide close status and open items, then either hand off a cleanup project or continue the agreed recurring cadence.
The aim is not to promise an error-free ledger. It is to create a traceable review path so material differences, missing source data and unresolved decisions are visible before the accounting period is treated as complete.
Settlement batches are checked against related bank deposits, with timing differences and unmatched items identified.
Fees, refunds, disputes and adjustments are reviewed as separate movements instead of disappearing inside net cash.
Missing reports, duplicated entries, unusual transactions and open questions are captured for follow-up rather than guessed.
Where COGS is in scope, the close checks whether the required cost and inventory input has been provided and approved.
Reconciliation considers payout timing and settlement currency so activity is not compared across mismatched periods or currencies.
The client can see what is complete, what remains open and which items need a finance, tax or operational decision outside the routine workflow.
Some ecommerce finance issues require broader implementation work or specialist professional judgement. These items should be identified early so the engagement is scoped responsibly.
Typical buyers include founders, ecommerce operators and finance teams who need better reconciliation coverage without confusing operational accounting support with specialist tax, audit or policy responsibility.
These answers explain the practical boundaries, data dependencies and buying decisions around a scoped Ecommerce Accounting engagement.
Email ID, Phone and Requirement Details are required. Name is optional. The arithmetic check and consent acknowledgement are validated before submission.